The Ballarat Summer Tournament 2003
A good field of 19 Ballarat players is participating in this, the 2003 Ballarat Summer, competition. Most of the usual suspects have entered with the notable exceptions of Jing Jia, who currently plays in the Junior World Championships in Greece and Kevin Perrin, due to work commitments.
The event is a 7 rounds Swiss Open with 40/90 time controls, followed by
20/30 No Name Result Name
Round 7 (last) Results- December 3rd 2003:
1 Rutherford, Simon [5.5] :
Davis, Geoff [4] 1-0
2 Brotheridge, Jamie [4.5] :
Van Riel, Bas [4] 0-1
3 Lavery, John [3.5]
: Cook, Patrick [4]
1-0
4 Stewart, Scott [3]
: Madden, Judd [3]
0-1
5 Young, Darren [3] : Andrews, Charlie [3]
0-1
6 Abson, John [2.5] : Lumsdon, Peter [3]
0-1
7 Bailey, Robert [2] : Lenne, Patrick [2.5]
0-1
8 O'Brien, Marc [1.5]
: Bailey, Mitchel [2.5]
1-0
9 Frangakis, John [1.5] : Schreenen, Michael [1]
1-0
10 Stewart, Clint [2] 1:0
BYE
The last (7th) round saw pairings which few would have predicted before the tournament started. Topboard was played in advance. Simon 'duly' won his game finishing the tournament 1.5 points clear of the no.2, Bas van Riel. The latter won a far from perfect game with (unsound) sacrifices on both sides against Jamie Brotheridge who can look back at a very successful debut at the Ballarat Chess Club. In the other important game for 2-3 place, John Lavery had a small advantage from the opening, which he very gradually increased in a very interesting game. Patrick Cook came up with all the correct answers until he lost in a well played (by John) rook ending. An exciting game was played between Scott Stewart and Judd Madden, in which Judd held on grimly to a dangerous position, but with the exchange up. I was told that Marc O'Brien won via a nice piece sacrifice against the rapidly improving Mitchel Bailey.
The tournament was very competently and diligently (for lack of a better term) run by Scott Stewart.
|
Ballarat 2003 |
Summer |
Total |
Stand | |||||||||||||||||||
| Rating | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | (final) | ||
| 1.S.Rutherford | 2291FM | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6½ | 1 | ||||||||||||
| 2.B.van Riel | 1764 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| 3.P.Cook | 1707 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | ||||||||||||
| 4.J.Lavery | 1653 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 4½ | 3-4 | ||||||||||||
| 5.P.Lumsdon | 1642 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 4 | 5-9 | ||||||||||||
| 6.S.Stewart | 1648 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11-13 | ||||||||||||
| 7.C.Andrews | 1577 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | ||||||||||||
| 8.G.Davis | 1539 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 4 | 5-9 | ||||||||||||
| 9.Brotheridge, J | unr | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4½ | 3-4 | ||||||||||||
| 10.P.Lenne | 1431 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3½ | 10 | ||||||||||||
| 11 M.O'Brien | 1354 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2½ | 14-17 | ||||||||||||
| 12.J.Madden | 1292 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | ||||||||||||
| 13.R.Bailey | 1283 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | ||||||||||||
| 14.J.Frangakis | 1244 | 0 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2½ | 14-17 | |||||||||||||
| 15.C.Stewart | 1222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11-13 | ||||||||||||
| 16.J.Abson | 992 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2½ | 14-17 | ||||||||||||
| 17.D.Young | 864 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11-13 | ||||||||||||
| 18.M.Schreenen | 839 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 19 | ||||||||||||
| 19.M.Bailey | 606 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2½ | 13-16 |
|
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3
d6 3. d4
cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5.
Nc3 a6
6. Bc4 e6 7. Be3
Be7 8. f3 Nc6 9.
Qd2 Bd7 10. |
Round 1 (23 Oct 2003)
O'Brien, M (11) - Rutherford, S (1)
0-1
Stewart, S (5) - Bailey, R (13) 1-0
Frangakis, J (14 - Lumsdon, P (6)
0-1
Andrews, C (7) - Stewart, C (15) 1-0
Abson, J (16) - Davis, G (8)
½-½
Brotheridge, J (9) - Young, D (17) 1-0
Schreenen, M (18) - Lenne, P
(10) 0-1
Madden, J (12) - Cook, P (3) 0-1
Van Riel, B (2) 1/2 : BYE
Lavery, J (4) 1/2 : BYE
Bailey, M (19) 1.0 : BYE
The first round saw a strange draw as B.van Riel and J.Lavery, who were
not available, were both given a half point bye each, and P.Cook being seeded
16th for some reason.
The only surprising result of round 1 was the draw by John Abson against Geoff Davis, but a major upset was in the air when Peter Lumsdon was a piece down and about to resign, but John Frangakis returned the favor and blundered horribly.
Round 2 (30 Oct 2003)
Rutherford, S (1) - Brotheridge, J (9)
1-0
Lenne, P (10) - Stewart, S (5) 0-1
Lumsdon, P (6) - Bailey, M (19)
½-½
Cook, P (3) - Andrews, C (7) 1-0
Davis, G (8) - Van Riel, B (2) 0-1
Lavery, J (4) - Abson, J (16) 1-0
Stewart, C (15) - O'Brien, M (11) 1-0
Young, D (17) - Madden, J (12) 0-1
Bailey, R (13) - Frangakis, J (14)
0-1
Schreenen, M (18) 1:0 BYE
In round 2 things became slightly more serious, with a grudge match between John Frangakis against Rob Bailey (John was lucky this time!), a hard-fought win by Bas van Riel against Geoff Davis and a (minor) surprise win by Clint Stewart against Marc O'Brien.
It looks like the third round
will mark the start of the process of separating the 'men from the
boys'....
Round 3 (6th Nov
2003)
Stewart, S (2) - Rutherford, S (2) ½-½
P.Lumsdon (1½)- Cook, P (2) ½-½
Van
Riel, B (1½) - Lavery, J (1½) ½-½
Andrews, C (1) - Schreenen, M
(1) 1-0
Brotheridge, J (1) - Stewart, C (1) 1-0
Bailey, M (1½) - Lenne, P
(1) 0-1
Bailey, R (0) - Davis, G (0.5) 0-1
Abson, J (0.5) -
Young, D (0) 0-1
Frangakis, J (1) BYE
Madden,
J (1) BYE
O'Brien, M (0) BYE
The postponed game of the previous round between Peter Lumsdon and Mitchell Bailey finished in a draw after an excellent fight by Mitchell.
Remarkably the three games at the top boards all ended up in draws. By far the best result was Scott Stewarts (white) effort against Simon Rutherford (see game below). The latter has scored 100% in all his (20 odd) games which he has played sofar since joining the Ballarat Chess Club. Scott played a very nice, controlled game, having a (light) advantage most of the time and keeping Simon on his toes as white's attack was very dangerous. They agreed to a draw in a very unbalanced and unclear position, when no-one dared to take the risks anymore.
The games between Patrick Cook and Peter Lumsdon follow a familiar pattern: Peter wants to win and Patrick is happy with a drawn outcome. The latter attitude often infuriates Peter who then takes greater risks. Those are the best opportunities for Patrick to pounce when he is in the right mood.
In this game nothing really
happened and it quickly 'petered' out into a draw. The new club member, John
Brotheridge, has adjusted very quickly, scoring his (2) points fairly
convincingly.
Round 4 Results -
November 13th 2003
1 Rutherford, S (2½) : Cook, P (2½) 1-0 2 Van Riel, B (2) : Stewart, S (2½) 1-0 3 Lavery, J (2) : Andrews, C (2) 1-0 4 Brotheridge, J (2) : Lumsdon, P (2) 1-0 5 Lenne, P (2) : Davis, G (1½) ½-½ 6 Madden, J (1) : Bailey, M (1½) 1-0 7 Stewart, C (1) : Schreenen, M (1)1-0 8 Young, D (1) : O'Brien, M (0) 0-1 9 Abson, J (½) : Bailey, R (0) 1-0 10 Frangakis, J (1) : BYE
Quite a few wins by 'white' players. The only exception occurred between Darren Young and Marc O'Brien,
where the white player went through his flag at move 39, in a position where he was the exchange up.
The surprise of the evening was the good win by James Brotheridge against Peter Lumsdon, who seems
to have handled the game too much in a cavalier way.
Simon Rutherford won a nice game against Patrick Cook using his extra space, in combination
with an active bishop-pair to maximum effect. The game between Bas van Riel
and Scot Stewart became a non-event, when Scot lost the plot completely after the Staunton gambit at move 12.
Robert Bailey continues to lose good games, this time after blundering a full rook against John Abson.
|
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3
Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4.
Nxd4 Nf6
5. Nc3 e5 6. Ndb5 d6
7. Bg5 a6 8. Na3
b5 9. Nd5 Be7
10. Bxf6 Bxf6 11. c3 |
Round 5 Results - November 20th 2003
1 Rutherford, Simon
[3.5] 1:0 Van Riel,
Bas [3]
2
Stewart, Scott
[2.5] ½.½: Lavery,
John [3]
3
Lenne, Patrick
[2.5] 0:1
Brotheridge, Jamie [3]
4 Cook,
Patrick
[2.5] 1:0
Stewart, Clint [2]
5
Davis, Geoff
[2]
1:0 Lumsdon, Peter [2]
6 Madden, Judd
[2]
1:0 Abson, John
[1.5]
7 Bailey, Mitchel
[1.5]
1:0 Frangakis, John [1]
8 Schreenen, Michael [1]
0:1 Young, Darren
[1]
9 O'Brien, Marc
[1]
0:1 Bailey,
Robert [0]
10 Andrews,
Charlie [2]
: Bye
Simon Rutherford won on topboard against Bas van Riel (see game near the bottom of the page). Bas missed a favorable continuation in the early middlegame, allowing Simon to show his rook-ending technique. Meanwhile newcomer Jamie Brotheridge continues to baffle his opponents, now standing in sole second position on the ladder. John Lavery received a pleasant surprise when Scott Stewart offered him a draw in a lost position, which he gladly accepted. Other notable results were the complicated win by Geoff Davis over Peter Lumsdon, young Mitchell Baileys win over B-grade champion John Frangakis, and Rob Bailey's first win of this tournament.
Round 6 Results - November 27th 2003
1 Lavery, John [3.5]
: Rutherford, Simon [4.5] 0-1
2 Cook, Patrick [3.5] :
Brotheridge, Jamie [4] ½-½
3 Van Riel, Bas [3]
: Madden, Judd [3]
1-0
4 Davis, Geoff [3]
: Stewart, Scott [3]
1-0
5 Lumsdon, Peter [2] :
Lenne, Patrick [2.5] 1-0
6 Andrews, Charlie [2] :
Bailey, Mitchel [2.5] 1-0
7 Stewart, Clint [2]
: Young, Darren [2]
0-1
8 Schreenen, Michael [1] : Abson, John
[1.5] 0-1
9 Frangakis, John [1] :
O'Brien, Marc [1]
½-½
10 Bailey, Robert [1] 1:0
BYE
Jamie Brotheridge (black)

Patrick Cook (white to move)
Round 6
With only one round to go, Simon Rutherford has won the tournament already after winning his game against John Lavery employing his trusted Caro Kann defence once more. Even John's thorough preparation beforehand (intending to follow a Botwinnik-Tal game) didn't help him.The surprise packet of the event, Jamie Brotheridge, had Patrick Cook on the ropes. He reached the completely winning position in the above diagram in no time (1...g4 winning a bishop), but he must have fallen asleep from here on to allow the game to peter out in a draw! Other games developed more or less as expected, although I know (?) that Bas van Riel had to survive some anxious moments completing 15 moves in 6 minutes albeit in a better position (i.e.a triple pawn advantage).